Clement Attlee: Why Britain Did Not Use Force In Iran

Former Prime Minister Explains Decision


Arash Norouzi

The Mossadegh Project | January 1, 2025                   


“I do not myself think an Empire is really compatible with democracy.” — Clement Attlee (1961)

A Prime Minister Remembers: The War and Post-War Memoirs of the Rt. Hon. Earl Attlee (1961) When Iran nationalized the British-owned Anglo-Iranian Oil Company installations in Abadan, the British Labor government considered using the military to recover the seized properties.

A decade later, the interview-based memoir of Prime Minister Clement Attlee was published. He told Francis Williams that the use of force would have been wrong strategically and morally, and sympathized with Foreign Secretary Herbert Morrison due to the difficult position he found himself in.

What did Morrison himself think in retrospect? In his own 1960 memoir, Morrison actually took the opposite position.

Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC/BP) | Archive
British Foreign Office documents on Iran



Premier Clement Attlee On Force In Iran

“I think if we had used force we would have raised the whole of Asia against us and a great deal of public opinion in the rest of the world too. And it would have been quite wrong morally and politically. It was impossible for us as a Labour Government to say that you couldn’t nationalise the oil industry. The Persians had done it the wrong way — but one had to consider the situation, and the provocation. At this time of day it was quite out of the question to think you could revert to old form and act as a big nation throwing in its force to defend its commercial interests. Quite wrong, and certainly quite impossible for us, of all people.

It was hard on Herbert to have this on his plate when he hadn’t been in the Foreign Office five minutes. [Foreign Secretary Herbert Morrison] It hurt his reputation all round. That was one of the reasons why I agreed to stay on as Leader after the Election. I wanted to go, but everybody said, ‘No, you must stay, you are our biggest asset,’ and apart from everything else it seemed a bit unfair, when I thought it over, to raise the issue of the Leadership when Herbert, who naturally had expectations, was in this position. Other things being equal, it seemed right to leave time for his reputation to recover. As it turned out, it didn’t make any difference. When I did go in 1955, the Party decided it didn’t want Herbert and chose Gaitskell. [Hugh Gaitskell] I hadn’t anything to do with that. The Leadership of the Labour Party isn’t an hereditary position, one doesn’t choose one’s successor. But Herbert’s chance would have been even smaller in 1951 than it turned out to be in 1955.”


• Source: A Prime Minister Remembers: The War and Post-War Memoirs of the Rt. Hon. Earl Attlee (1961)

• “Empire” quote: Azad Memorial Lecture, Indian Council for Cultural Relations, 1961. Cited in Ibid.




Search MohammadMossadegh.com



Related links:

British Premier Clement Attlee | Labour Party Manifesto Speech (Oct. 1, 1951)

They Wanted To Use Force In Persia | Ian Colvin, October 22, 1952

Winston Churchill Laments Declining British Empire (Oct. 2, 1951 Campaign Speech)



MOSSADEGH t-shirts — “If I sit silently, I have sinned”

Facebook  Twitter  YouTube  Tumblr   Instagram